内容摘要:本文探讨了“合法性”与“权力”在金融区域主义方面的因果效应。当前以G7为主导的全球体制中合法性的明显缺失和国家间权力格局的变化影响了东亚的政策决策。东亚国家寻求“抗衡性”的战略,也即在保持着与以G7为中心的全球金融体制合作关系的情况下,通过发展自身的区域性制度(或其他潜在方案)以避免对前者的过度...
关键词:合法性;权力;金融区域主义
作者简介:
【摘 要】本文探讨了“合法性”与“权力”在金融区域主义方面的因果效应。当前以G7为主导的全球体制中合法性的明显缺失和国家间权力格局的变化影响了东亚的政策决策。东亚国家寻求“抗衡性”的战略,也即在保持着与以G7为中心的全球金融体制合作关系的情况下,通过发展自身的区域性制度(或其他潜在方案)以避免对前者的过度...
【作 者】孙仁柱
【作者单位】香港大学政治与公共行政学系
【期 刊】《金融评论》2012年第1期49-56,共8页
【关 键 词】合法性 权力 金融区域主义
【分 类 号】F02F33
【全文下载】
【参考文献】
[1]Andreas Hasenelever, Peter Mayer and Volker Rittberger (1997) :Theory oflnternational Regimes, Cambridge University Press; Thomas M. Franck(1990) :The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. Oxford University Press.
[2]Martha Finnemore and Stephen J. Toope(2001):"Alternative to 'Legalization': Richer Views of Law and Politics", International Organization, 55, No.3, 745-758.
[3]Judith Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Robert Keohanc and Ann-Marie slaughter(2001 ) : "Response to Finnemore and Toope", Ircternational Organization, 55, No. 3, 759-760.
[4]Wayne sandholtz (1992):High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Cooperation, Berkeley: University of California Press, p. 15.
[5]Andrew Hurrell(1995):"Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective", in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell (eds) Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order, New York: Oxford University Press; Joseph M. Gfieco (1997): "Systemic Sources of Variation in Regional Institutionalization in Western Europe, East Asia and Americas", in Edward D. Mansfield and Helen V. Milner (eds) The Political Economy of Regionalism, New York: Columbia University Press; Kenneth Waltz (1997): "Structural Realism after the Cold War", International Security, 25, 5-41.
[6]RandallHenning (2006):"The Exchange-Rate Weapon and Macroeconomic Conflict", in David Andrews (ed) International Monetary Power, Ithaca: ComeU University Press.
[7]Angus Maddison(2008 ):Chinese Economic Performance inthe Long Run, Paris: OECD Development Center.
[8]David P. Rapkin and Jonathan R. Strand (2003): "Is East Asia Under-Represented in the International Monetary Fund.'? " International Relations of the Asia-Pacific ,3( 1 ) : 1-28. 51.
[9]Richard Higgott and Nicola Phillips (2000): "Challenging Triumphalism and Convergence: The Limits of Global Liberalization in Asia and Latin America", Review oflnternational Studies, 26, No.3.
[10]Natasha Hamilton-Hart (2003):"Asian New Reglonalism: Governance Capacity and Co-operation in the Western Pacific", Review of International Political Economy, 10.







